Mission:
To create safer
environments and
improve the quality
of life through the use
of CPTED principles
and strategies
The latest ICA Newsletter, CPTED Perspectives is now avilable for download! To get your copy Click here!
Optical illusions are to be painted onto city streets in the United States in an effort to slow traffic. View the pictures and story here!
ICA International Director Tony Lake in the The Daily Post - Rotorua, NZ
ICA Member Mike Teskey in the The News Tribune - Tacoma,WA,USA
from European Journal of Criminology, Reassessing the Fear of Crime by Emily Gray,Keele University, UK, E.Gray@keele.ac.uk, Jonathan Jackson, London School of Economics, UK, J.P.Jackson@lse.ac.uk and Stephen Farrall, Sheffield University, UK, S.Farrall@sheffield.ac.uk
A large body of empirical research exploring emotional responses to crime in Europe, North America and elsewhere suggests that substantial proportions of the public worry about victimization. The British Crime Survey (BCS) has asked questions exploring English and Welsh respondents' worry about crime since 1982, and in the 20034 sweep of the BCS new questions were inserted into a subsection to explore the frequency and intensity of such fearful events. As well as illustrating the rationale of the new measurement strategy, this research note reports the results of the new questions in direct relation to the `old' methods. The findings show that few people experience specific events of worry on a frequent basis and that `old'-style questions magnify the everyday experience of fear. We propose that `worry about crime' is often best seen as a diffuse anxiety about risk rather than any pattern of everyday concerns over personal safety.
This page will list downloadable resources for the CPTED Practitioner. If you are aware of an online resource or would like to submit something for listing please
If you utilize resources from these sources please remember to give credit to the author/publisher. Please report broken links to the office by email.
European Journal of Criminology, Vol. 4, No. 1, 109-128 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1477370807071733
© 2007 European Society of Criminology, SAGE Publications
The importance and expansion of the role of private security officers in policing have led many countries to introduce special legislation to govern them. Many industrialized countries have a long history of such measures. The structures and standards introduced, however, have varied significantly. In North America generally minimal standards have been mandated that centre on character. In many European countries, by contrast, standards have been comprehensive, sometimes including hundreds of hours of mandatory training. In England and Wales, however, it was only in 2001 that such legal intervention was finally introduced, and the system that has begun to unfold has caused much debate on its effectiveness. Significant sectors have been excluded, and comprehensive standards of regulation have been rejected for an approach barely above North American standards of governance. This paper will examine the emerging English system of legal control. It will compare some of its features with those of other European countries and produce a league table from this. Reference will also be made to North America and Australia. It will be argued that the system to be introduced for security guards in England and Wales falls below European norms and needs to be more demanding if the performance and accountability of the industry are to be enhanced and the industry is to play the expanding role in policing that many increasingly expect.
Thefts of and from autos are among the most commonly reported crimes, and they account for the highest losses among property crimes that target individuals (except for arson). But according to this new book, recent initiatives in the U.S., Europe and Australia have proven effective or are showing promise in preventing car theft.
In addition to Michael G. Maxfield's introduction, the chapter topics include: (1) the U.K. Car Theft Index (by Gloria Laycock); (2) preventing vehicle crime in Australia through public-private parterships and national collaboration (by Ray Carroll); (3) improved vehicle licensing and registration systems in the U.K. (by Barry Webb, Melissa Smith and Gloria Laycock); (4) reduction of abuses involving temporary license tags in North Carolina (by Matthew White and Charles W. Dean); (5) the impact of electronic immbolizers (by Rich Brown); (6) measures to enhance parking lot security (by Pat Mayhew and Greg Braun); (7) action implications of crime analyses involving parking lot auto thefts in Chula Vista, California (by Nancy Plouffe and Rana Sampson); (8) police intelligence and the theft of vehicles for export from the U.K. (by Rick Brown and Ronald V. Clarke); (9) publicity campaigns and car crime prevention (by Emmanuel Barthe); and (10) the history of car safety improvements compared to enhanced car security in the U.S. (Graeme R. Newman).
George L. Kelling and Michael L. Wagers of the Police Institute at Rutgers University state in the Foreword that " analyzing problems and collaboration are the future of criminal justice. This volume on understanding and preventing car theft offers a glimpse of that future, illustrating what can be gained through collaborative problem solving across sectors and jurisdictions."
From a review by Martin Wright in Professional Security magazine (Feb. 2005): "...this is a very valuable publication that has certainly raised a number of wide ranging thoughts within the mind of this reviewer. If a book is to be assessed by its ability to make one think, then this publication is worth its weight in gold."